If the initial hazard choice can't reduce residual risk, what should be done?

Choosing new hazard controls is the most appropriate course of action when the initial hazard choice fails to reduce residual risk. Hazard controls are measures or actions taken to minimize or eliminate risks associated with a particular hazard. When the initial controls do not adequately mitigate the risks, it indicates that the chosen method or strategy is insufficient or ineffective.

In such cases, it is essential to evaluate other potential controls or methods that may provide better risk reduction. This could involve identifying alternative engineering controls, administrative procedures, or personal protective equipment that can more effectively mitigate the residual risk. This proactive approach ensures that risks are continuously managed and improved upon, helping to enhance overall safety and compliance within the organization.

Implementing additional training may be beneficial in some contexts, but if the initial hazard controls are ineffective, merely increasing training will not address the underlying issue of inadequate risk mitigation. Documenting findings is important for accountability and compliance but does not actively reduce risk. Ignoring the issue presents significant safety concerns and is not a responsible choice. Thus, selecting new hazard controls is essential for ensuring a safer environment.